claude-fable-5-1 vs deepseek-flash
Fourteen priced metrics for the same 2,000-in / 300-out call, with and without provider caching, and what TokenZero's cascade would do with the pair.
At list prices as of 2026-10-26, deepseek-flash costs $0.42 per million blended tokens on a 2,000-in / 300-out call against $15.22 for claude-fable-5-1, 97.3% less. With the static prefix cached both drop further: $20.38 versus $0.52 per thousand calls. TokenZero routes only prompts its classifier scores simple and holds a 99.8% parity floor.
· Source: provider list prices verified in pricing table 2026-10-26; costs computed by the same code that signs TokenZero receipts
At a glance
- Cheaper per blended token
- deepseek-flash by 97.3% (computed)
- claude-fable-5-1 blended $/1M
- $15.22 (computed)
- deepseek-flash blended $/1M
- $0.42 (computed)
- Input $/1M
- $10.00 vs $0.30
- Output $/1M
- $50.00 vs $1.20
- Cached input $/1M
- $0.250 vs $0.006
- Cache discount
- 98% vs 98% (computed)
- Monthly at 100k calls
- $3,500 vs $96 (computed)
- Saved per 1M calls
- $34,040 (computed)
- Providers
- anthropic vs deepseek
- Lifecycle
- active, no retirement announced vs active, no retirement announced
- Parity floor for routing
- 99.8% (shadow-eval breaker)
claude-fable-5-1 vs deepseek-flash: list prices and the same workload on both (USD, table 2026-10-26)
| Metric | claude-fable-5-1 | deepseek-flash | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider · tier | anthropic · frontier | deepseek · fast | different providers |
| Input $/1M | $10.00 | $0.30 | 97% gap |
| Output $/1M | $50.00 | $1.20 | 97.6% gap |
| Cached input $/1M | $0.250 | $0.006 | 98% / 98% off input |
| Cache write $/1M | $12.500 | no surcharge | |
| Minimum cacheable prefix | 512 tokens | 1024 tokens | |
| Effective blended $/1M (2,000 in / 300 out) | $15.22 | $0.42 | deepseek-flash 97.3% less |
| Per call | $0.03500 | $0.00096 | $0.03404 |
| Per month at 100k calls | $3,500 | $96 | $3,404 |
| …with the 1,500-token prefix cached | $2,038 | $52 | $1,986 |
| Long-context threshold | single tier | single tier | |
| Processing tiers | speed: fast 2x | standard only | |
| Lifecycle | active, no retirement announced | active, no retirement announced | |
| Cheaper sibling (cascade target) | claude-opus-5-5 | — | |
| TokenZero cascade recommendation | none (cascade stays within one provider; cross-provider moves only on failover) | $34,040 saved per 1M calls if every call moved; $13,616 at a 40% simple-prompt share | 99.8% parity floor, breaker on |
Use either model through TokenZero
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=https://tokenzero.sh
OPENAI_BASE_URL=https://tokenzero.sh/v1
# keep your own keys; cache formatting on, routing advisory, signed receipt per callFree up to $500/month of routed spend; paid plans take 15% of verified savings with a 3x-ROI-or-$0 rule.
What is not on this page
Third-party quality scores (coding ELO, extraction accuracy, reasoning benchmarks) and per-model latency are not shown because TokenZero does not measure them; the numbers above are prices and the arithmetic on them. The latency benchmark shows what the gateway does measure.
Questions people ask
Which is cheaper, claude-fable-5-1 or deepseek-flash?
deepseek-flash. At list prices as of 2026-10-26 it costs $0.42 per million blended tokens versus $15.22 for claude-fable-5-1, a 97.3% gap on a 2,000-input / 300-output call. Per month at 100,000 calls that is $96 versus $3,500.
How much does prompt caching change the claude-fable-5-1 vs deepseek-flash gap?
Cached input costs $0.250 on claude-fable-5-1 and $0.006 on deepseek-flash per million. With a 1,500-token static prefix cached, 100,000 calls cost $2,038 and $52 respectively; TokenZero's formatter places the breakpoints and sets prompt_cache_key automatically.
Can TokenZero route claude-fable-5-1 traffic to deepseek-flash safely?
Not automatically: cascade routing stays inside one provider so the request shape, tools and keys are unchanged. Cross-provider moves happen only on failover when you name the fallback model and key. Use the calculator to price a manual migration of the workload.
Is claude-fable-5-1 or deepseek-flash being retired?
claude-fable-5-1: active, no retirement announced. deepseek-flash: active, no retirement announced. TokenZero audits flag retired ids and the gateway warns in X-TokenZero-Warning with the provider's replacement.
Related
Price your own workload on claude-fable-5-1 and deepseek-flash