claude-opus-5-5 vs gpt-5.4
Fourteen priced metrics for the same 2,000-in / 300-out call, with and without provider caching, and what TokenZero's cascade would do with the pair.
At list prices as of 2026-10-26, gpt-5.4 costs $4.13 per million blended tokens on a 2,000-in / 300-out call against $6.09 for claude-opus-5-5, 32.1% less. With the static prefix cached both drop further: $8.30 versus $6.13 per thousand calls. TokenZero routes only prompts its classifier scores simple and holds a 99.8% parity floor.
· Source: provider list prices verified in pricing table 2026-10-26; costs computed by the same code that signs TokenZero receipts
At a glance
- Cheaper per blended token
- gpt-5.4 by 32.1% (computed)
- claude-opus-5-5 blended $/1M
- $6.09 (computed)
- gpt-5.4 blended $/1M
- $4.13 (computed)
- Input $/1M
- $4.00 vs $2.50
- Output $/1M
- $20.00 vs $15.00
- Cached input $/1M
- $0.200 vs $0.250
- Cache discount
- 95% vs 90% (computed)
- Monthly at 100k calls
- $1,400 vs $950 (computed)
- Saved per 1M calls
- $4,500 (computed)
- Providers
- anthropic vs openai
- Lifecycle
- active, no retirement announced vs active, no retirement announced
- Parity floor for routing
- 99.8% (shadow-eval breaker)
claude-opus-5-5 vs gpt-5.4: list prices and the same workload on both (USD, table 2026-10-26)
| Metric | claude-opus-5-5 | gpt-5.4 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider · tier | anthropic · frontier | openai · frontier | different providers |
| Input $/1M | $4.00 | $2.50 | 37.5% gap |
| Output $/1M | $20.00 | $15.00 | 25% gap |
| Cached input $/1M | $0.200 | $0.250 | 95% / 90% off input |
| Cache write $/1M | $5.000 | no surcharge | |
| Minimum cacheable prefix | 512 tokens | 1024 tokens | |
| Effective blended $/1M (2,000 in / 300 out) | $6.09 | $4.13 | gpt-5.4 32.1% less |
| Per call | $0.01400 | $0.00950 | $0.00450 |
| Per month at 100k calls | $1,400 | $950 | $450 |
| …with the 1,500-token prefix cached | $830 | $613 | $218 |
| Long-context threshold | single tier | 272,000 tokens ($5.00 in / $22.50 out above) | |
| Processing tiers | speed: fast 2x | flex 0.5x · fast 2x | |
| Lifecycle | active, no retirement announced | active, no retirement announced | |
| Cheaper sibling (cascade target) | claude-sonnet-5-5 | gpt-5.4-mini | |
| TokenZero cascade recommendation | none (cascade stays within one provider; cross-provider moves only on failover) | $4,500 saved per 1M calls if every call moved; $1,800 at a 40% simple-prompt share | 99.8% parity floor, breaker on |
Use either model through TokenZero
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=https://tokenzero.sh
OPENAI_BASE_URL=https://tokenzero.sh/v1
# keep your own keys; cache formatting on, routing advisory, signed receipt per callFree up to $500/month of routed spend; paid plans take 15% of verified savings with a 3x-ROI-or-$0 rule.
What is not on this page
Third-party quality scores (coding ELO, extraction accuracy, reasoning benchmarks) and per-model latency are not shown because TokenZero does not measure them; the numbers above are prices and the arithmetic on them. The latency benchmark shows what the gateway does measure.
Questions people ask
Which is cheaper, claude-opus-5-5 or gpt-5.4?
gpt-5.4. At list prices as of 2026-10-26 it costs $4.13 per million blended tokens versus $6.09 for claude-opus-5-5, a 32.1% gap on a 2,000-input / 300-output call. Per month at 100,000 calls that is $950 versus $1,400.
How much does prompt caching change the claude-opus-5-5 vs gpt-5.4 gap?
Cached input costs $0.200 on claude-opus-5-5 and $0.250 on gpt-5.4 per million. With a 1,500-token static prefix cached, 100,000 calls cost $830 and $613 respectively; TokenZero's formatter places the breakpoints and sets prompt_cache_key automatically.
Can TokenZero route claude-opus-5-5 traffic to gpt-5.4 safely?
Not automatically: cascade routing stays inside one provider so the request shape, tools and keys are unchanged. Cross-provider moves happen only on failover when you name the fallback model and key. Use the calculator to price a manual migration of the workload.
Is claude-opus-5-5 or gpt-5.4 being retired?
claude-opus-5-5: active, no retirement announced. gpt-5.4: active, no retirement announced. TokenZero audits flag retired ids and the gateway warns in X-TokenZero-Warning with the provider's replacement.